We have a brand new updated website! Click here to check it out!

2 hospitalized after head-on crash in the snow

KHPALTAMONT- Two people were injured in an accident just before 10 a.m. on Saturday in Labette County.

The Kansas Highway Patrol reported a 2004 Ford Mustang driven by Kaylie R. Hawkins, 14, Liberty, was westbound on U.S. 160 twelve miles west of Altamont.

The driver lost control on the snow-covered road. The vehicle crossed the centerline and hit a 2014 Chevy Cruze head-on.

Hawkins and the driver of the Cruze Marty Alan Lee Easley, 35, Independence, were transported to Labette County Medical Center.

The KHP reported both were properly restrained at the time of the accident.

Hyundai recalls cars due to power-steering problem

RecallNEW YORK (AP) — Hyundai is recalling about 263,000 cars in the U.S. and Canada because a sensor problem could cause drivers to lose power-assisted steering.

The company has not reported any injuries or accidents. A representative for Hyundai Motor America wasn’t immediately available for comment.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says a sensor in the affected cars could detect a discrepancy in the steering input and signals and disable power-assisted steering as a result. Cars would revert to manual steering and require greater effort to steer at low speeds, raising the risk of a crash.

The affected cars include model years 2008 to 2010 of Elantras and Elantra Touring vehicles made between Nov. 1, 2008 and April 30.

Owners can contact Hyundai’s customer service at 1-855-671-3059.

Business Appreciation Month Awards nomination deadline near

KS Dept of Commerce logoKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

TOPEKA–The Kansas Department of Commerce will continue to accept nominations for the 2015 Business Appreciation Month awards until March 20. The awards recognize successful Kansas companies that create jobs, support their local communities and enhance the quality of life in Kansas.

Regional finalists are recognized in June during the Team Kansas awards banquet, with the top nominee receiving the Governor’s Award of Excellence, the highest award given to a business by the state. The 2014 winner was Galaxy Technologies of Winfield.

Nominations are accepted from chambers of commerce, economic development organizations, small business development centers, organizations and individuals. Companies may also nominate themselves.

Nominations will be accepted through 5 p.m., Friday, March 20. Regional winners will be selected in the manufacturing/distribution, service, retail and hospital/non-profit sectors. Regional winners will then give presentations about their companies and community involvement to a panel of judges. The recipient of the Governor’s Award of Excellence will be announced at the Team Kansas awards ceremony. Late nominations cannot be accepted.

Award qualifications include:
· Business expansion in Kansas.
· Successful employee retention and recruitment practices.
· Employee training/educational programs.
· Capital investment in Kansas.
· Support of local activities including school activities, community events, economic development and leadership programs.

To submit an online nomination, visit KansasCommerce.com/BAM. For more information, contact Sarah Heinen at (785) 296-3805 or sheinen@kansascommerce.com.

SE Kansas woman sentenced for husband’s death

jail  prisonPITTSBURG, Kan. (AP) — A Pittsburg woman has been sentenced to nearly 14 years in prison for fatally shooting her husband in 2013.

Carla C. Moutz was sentenced Friday for second-degree murder and aggravated assault for the death of her husband, 49-year-old John Moutz, at her father’s home in Pittsburg.

She was charged with first-degree murder but accepted a plea deal in January.

The Joplin Globe reports prosecutors say Moutz shot her after an alcohol-fueled argument.

Sen. Moran Meets with Ag Sec. Vilsack on priorities for the year

Screen Shot 2015-02-28 at 9.21.12 AMWASHINGTON – This week, U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), chairman of the Senate Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee, met with United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack about priorities for the 114th Congress.

“The Secretary and I discussed a number of key issues, including the importance of agriculture research, and agreed to work together to encourage innovation and the development of new technologies that will benefit rural areas of our country,” Sen. Moran said. “We also discussed implementation of the Farm Bill as well as initiatives and ways to operate USDA in a more cost-effective manner so the Department is efficiently using taxpayer dollars. I look forward to working with Secretary Vilsack on issues affecting rural America.”

Prior to being elected to the U.S. Senate, Sen. Moran served for 14 years on the U.S. House Agriculture Committee including as chairman of the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management. Throughout his time in Congress, he has been a leading advocate for protecting and preserving the special way of life Kansans enjoy. Sen. Moran continues the fight to make certain farming and ranching families have the opportunity to earn a living and pass on their agricultural heritage to the next generation of producers, all while working to eliminate wasteful spending.

Obama goes from interviewee to interviewer for StoryCorps

courtesy photo
courtesy photo

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is making the switch from interviewee to interviewer.

The president questioned a Maryland high school senior in the My Brother’s Keeper program. The interview for the StoryCorps oral history project was airing Friday on National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition.”

Noah McQueen discussed going from being in trouble with the law to being an award-winning student.

Obama asked McQueen how he softened after being a “knucklehead.” McQueen says he became accountable for his actions. He says as a black man, he feels pressure to always make the right decisions or be judged.

The president told McQueen he’ll probably make more mistakes since he’s only 18. But Obama said he’s proud of McQueen.

The interview marks the first anniversary of Obama’s initiative to help young minority men.

Missouri man sentenced for multiple Kansas burglaries

Jones
Jones

HUTCHINSON — A Missouri man convicted for 19 local burglaries in Hutchinson was sentenced Friday afternoon to a total of five years and eight months in prison.

Joseph Paul Jones Jr. was found guilty on all counts involving the crimes that occurred in the late night hours of May 13 and the early morning hours of May 14, 2014.

He was convicted for breaking into the local businesses by prying open doors or breaking the glass windows with a crow bar. The state says Jones cut the telephone lines at several businesses before making entry.

Jones, Jr. is responsible for restitution. The pre-sentence investigation had suggested the amount of about $11,215.00, but the state believes it may be more, so a hearing over restitution will be held on March 12.

He also faces charges in Sedgwick and Lyon Counties.

Oil train wrecks increase pressure for tougher safety rules

A Union Pacific train moves oil west of Hays.
A Union Pacific train moves oil across Kansas

JOAN LOWY, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Fiery wrecks this month of trains hauling crude oil are intensifying pressure on the Obama administration to approve tougher standards for railroads and tank cars, despite industry complaints that it could cost billions and slow freight deliveries.

On Feb. 5, the Transportation Department sent the White House draft rules that would require stronger tank cars and make other safety improvements.

Nine days later a train hauling crude oil and petroleum distillates derailed and caught fire in Ontario, Canada. Less than 48 hours later, another oil train derailed and caught fire in West Virginia.

Brigham McCown was responsible for safe transportation of hazardous materials during President George W. Bush’s administration. He says that the more incidents there are, the less willing the administration will be to listen to industry.

Middle-class taxpayers on Obamacare learn that it’s payback time

taxby Anna Gorman, KAISER HEALTH NEWS

Roberta and Curtis Campbell typically look forward to tax time. Most years, they receive a refund – a little extra cash to pay off credit card bills. But this year the California couple got a shock: According to their tax preparer, they owe the IRS more than $6,000.

That’s the money the Campbells received from the federal government last year to make their Obamacare health coverage more affordable.

Roberta, unemployed when she signed up for the plan, got a job halfway through the year and Curtis found full-time work. The couple’s total yearly income became too high to qualify for federal subsidies. Now they have to pay all the money all back.

“Oh my goodness, this is just not right,” said Roberta Campbell, who lives in the Sacramento suburb of Roseville. “This is supposed to be a safety net health care, and I am getting burned left and right by having used it.” As tax day approaches, hundreds of thousands of families who enrolled in plans through the online insurance marketplaces could be stuck with unexpected tax bills, according to researchers.

Those payments could be as high as $11,000, although most would be several hundred dollars, one study found. The result is frustration and confusion among some working and middle-class taxpayers, whom the Affordable Care Act was specifically intended to help.

The repayment obligations could dissuade people from re-enrolling and provide more fuel to Republicans’ continuing push for a repeal of the law. The problem is that many consumers didn’t realize that the subsidies were based on their total year-end income and couldn’t reliably project what would happen over the course of the year, said Alyene Senger, research associate at

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. “How do you know if you are going to get that promotion?” she said. “How do you know what your Christmas bonus is going to be?” In addition, Senger said the government didn’t go out of its way to publicize the tax consequences of receiving too much in federal subsidies.

“It isn’t really something the administration focused on heavily,” she said. “It’s not exactly popular.” Life changes can be tax liabilities The system was intended to ensure that people received the right amount in subsidies, no more or less than needed.

But the means the government chose to reconcile the numbers was the tax system — notorious for its complexity well before the Affordable Care Act passed. Some who enrolled in Obamacare now are realizing that certain positive life changes – a pay raise, a marriage, a spouse’s new job – can turn out to be a liability at tax time.

“We are definitely seeing some pain,” said Jackie Perlman, a principal tax research analyst at H&R Block. H&R Block released a report Tuesday saying that 52 percent of customers who received health coverage through the insurance marketplaces last year underestimated their income and now owe the government.

They estimate that the average subsidy repayment amount is $530. At the same time, about a third of those enrolled in marketplace coverage overestimated their income and are receiving money back – about $365 on average, the report said. Under the Affordable Care Act, the federal government made subsidies available to people who earned up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level — about $47,000 for an individual and $63,000 for a couple.

For families who ended up making less than that, the federal government limits any repayments that might be due: The poorest consumers will have to repay no more than $300 and most others no more than $2,500.

But the Campbells’ income last year exceeded the limit to receive federal help, so they have pay back the whole amount. Roberta Campbell said she was only trying to do the right thing. Campbell, now 59, lost her job as a program director for the Arthritis Foundation in late 2012.

She and her husband, who was working part-time as a merchandiser, downsized and moved into a smaller house. They were left uninsured but were mindful of the federal mandate to be covered as of January 2014. So they signed up for a plan through California’s insurance marketplace, Covered California. The plan cost about $1,400 a month, but they were able to qualify for a monthly subsidy of about $1,000. “We are rule followers,” she said.

“We decided to get insurance because we were supposed to get insurance.” They barely used the coverage. Roberta and Curtis each went to the doctor once for a check-up. Then, about halfway through the year, Roberta got a job at UC Davis and became insured through the university. Curtis, who had been working part-time, got a full-time job for a magazine distribution company.

They notified Covered California, which Campbell said cancelled the insurance after 30 days. But with the new salaries, his pension from a previous career and a brief period of unemployment compensation, the couple’s year-end income totaled about $85,000, making them ineligible for any subsidies.

Their tax preparer told them they would have been better off not getting insurance at all and just paying the fine for being uninsured. In that case, the Campbells say their financial obligation would have been much smaller – about $850. “The ironic thing is that we tried to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps,” Curtis Campbell said. “Now they are going to penalize us. It’s frustrating.”

It’s not surprising that the projections people made about their income in 2014 in many cases were incorrect, said Gerald Kominski, director of the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. The first open enrollment period started in October 2013, meaning that some enrollees based their estimates on what they earned in 2012.

Kominski said that policy experts knew there would be significant “churn” of people whose incomes change throughout the year and who would gain or lose their eligibility for subsidized coverage. But he and others said there was less understanding among consumers about how that could affect their taxes.

Adjustments allowed With tax season still under way, it not entirely clear how many people will have to repay the government for excess subsidies. But along with the recent H & R block estimates based on the firm’s customers, a UC Berkeley Labor Center study published in Health Affairs in 2013 suggested the numbers would not be not small.

Nationwide, 6.7 million people enrolled in marketplace exchanges through Obamacare in the first year. About 85 percent of people got federal help paying their insurance premiums. Using California as a model, labor center chair Ken Jacobs estimated that even if everyone reported income changes to the insurance marketplace during the year, nearly 23 percent of consumers who were eligible for subsidies would have to pay the government back at least some of the amount received.

About 9 percent of those receiving subsidies would have to pay the full amount. If no one reported changes, 38 percent would owe money. The median repayment – if people reported income changes along the way — would be about $243 but some couples could owe more than $11,000, according to the research.

The median amount due if people didn’t report the changes during the year would be $750. “The most important thing for people to do along the way is to report [income] changes so the subsidy amount is adjusted,”

Jacobs said. For those who must repay money, the IRS will allow payment in installments, even after the April 15 tax deadline. Interest will continue accruing, however, until the balance is paid. Covered California spokesman Dana Howard said he understands paying back excess subsidies puts some in a difficult spot.

But he said consumers who think their circumstances might change can decline the money or just take part of it. Howard also said the subsidies were designed to give the working class and middle class folks a leg up in affording health coverage. So when people get good jobs, he said, they don’t necessarily need the federal help to get insurance.

“When you get that really good fortune, that has to be shared back,” Howard said. “That is just how the ACA law was written.”

Roberts Votes Against DHS Funding Bill That Allows Executive Amnesty

Homeland Secuirty 001WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., today released the following statement after voting against the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2015 which fully funds President Obama’s illegal executive amnesty:

“President Obama’s executive amnesty is wrong, it has been rejected by the American people, and, according to a federal court, it is illegal. When I was elected, I swore to uphold the Constitution. That is an oath I take very seriously and I cannot support a bill that funds the President’s illegal executive order.”

“The Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse, and it is our obligation to use that power to stop executive overreaches like President’s executive amnesty. I cannot support legislation that allows actions that directly violate the separation of powers as defined in the Constitution.”

Copyright Eagle Radio | FCC Public Files | EEO Public File